The ninth annual America’s Best Architecture Schools study ranks accredited undergraduate and graduate architecture programs from the perspective of practitioners.
The ninth annual America’s Best Architecture Schools study ranks accredited undergraduate and graduate architecture programs from the perspective of practitioners. The survey, conducted in mid-2007, tapped architecture firm leaders who, during the past five years, have had direct experience in the hiring and performance of recent architecture graduates.
The survey, conducted in mid-2007, tapped architecture firm leaders who, during the past five years, have had direct experience in the hiring and performance of recent architecture graduates. Leading firms were queried about which accredited programs have best prepared students for today’s and tomorrow’s real-world practice. A cross-section of US firms with a disbursed geographic profile participated, including firms that are leaders in their market sector (i.e., healthcare, commercial, institutional) and that have won major national, state, local, and market-sector awards.
The National Architectural Accrediting Board (NAAB) is the sole accrediting body for US professional degree programs in architecture. These programs include the bachelor of architecture (BArch) and master of architecture (MArch) degrees, as well as the doctor of architecture (DArch) degree. Schools may also offer pre-professional degrees, such as a BA or BS in architecture, or post-professional programs in specialized areas at the master’s or doctorate level. However, only the three professional degree programs, BArch, MArch, and DArch, are accredited by NAAB. The requirements for becoming a licensed architect vary in each state; many states require that applicants have an accredited architecture degree.
Recently, several architecture schools have begun phasing out the BArch degree in favor of an MArch. In such cases where a BArch program is no longer open to new students but existing BArch students have yet to graduate, the BArch program was still included in the undergraduate study. However, the degree matrix does not list the transitional BArch programs that are no longer accepting new students.
The 2008 study queried participants about many other issues as well, such as what educators they admire, how programs rate in various skill sets, and sustainability, the results of which can be found on subsequent pages.
Leveraging individual strengths, challenging myths and becoming influential catalysts of change Read full »
Leveraging consumer creativity for productive, predictive, innovative architecture Read full »
The federal agency struggles to overcome challenges with a dwindling budget Read full »
DI.net RSS Feeds
DI.net on Twitter
- A North Korean Architect’s Crazy Visions of the Future | Design | WIRED ow.ly/zoXSo20 hours ago by @dinet
- 4,000 Photos (and More) Hightlighting Hong Kong's Iconic Neon Sign Culture - Core77 ow.ly/zoRzn22 hours ago by @dinet
- Global design & construction trade leads available from the US Commercial Service via their LinkedIn page: linkd.in/1trnYlk23 hours ago by @dinet