Redesign Your Profits: Value-Based Fee Structure

July 26, 2005 · by DesignIntelligence

A brutal fact of reality for architecture and engineering firms is that prevailing pricing and compensation methods—setting fees on the basis of direct labor cost (whether selling hours on a time-and-materials or lump-sum basis)—provide only minimal profits for most firms.

This article is for subscribers only.

Please Note

Existing members: if you have not logged in since August 21, 2012 please reset your password before logging in as we have transitioned to a new system that requires a new password.

Need help?

DFC Members

If you are already a Design Futures Council member or DesignIntelligence yearly subscriber, and don't have an account, please contact us and we will set it up for you.

America's Best Architecture Schools 2014

Apr 22, 2014 · by DesignIntelligence

In association with DesignIntelligence, Architecture Record presents this year’s rankings compiled by Greenway Group, along with related findings of interest. Read full »

Unsettled About Professional Compensation?

Apr 2, 2014 · by James P. Cramer

Innovating in response to evolution and change in professional practices Read full »

The Academy, Practice and the Center for Design Research

Apr 2, 2014 · by Robert Dunay

A dilemma and course of action for architectural education Read full »

Inside Out: The Art of Creating a High-performance Workforce

Mar 19, 2014 · by Bob Fisher

Setting the right levels of compensation: A balancing act Read full »

The Owners Dilemma

How Firms Succeed 5.0

Topics

DI.net RSS Feeds

DI.net on Twitter

Research Support