A brutal fact of reality for architecture and engineering firms is that prevailing pricing and compensation methods—setting fees on the basis of direct labor cost (whether selling hours on a time-and-materials or lump-sum basis)—provide only minimal profits for most firms.
This article is for subscribers only.
Please NoteExisting members: if you have not logged in since August 21, 2012 please reset your password before logging in as we have transitioned to a new system that requires a new password.
If you are already a Design Futures Council member or DesignIntelligence yearly subscriber, and don't have an account, please contact us and we will set it up for you.
Innovating in response to evolution and change in professional practices Read full »
A dilemma and course of action for architectural education Read full »
Setting the right levels of compensation: A balancing act Read full »
DI.net RSS Feeds
DI.net on Twitter
- VIDEO: Raising the Bar in Desk Design | ArchDaily ow.ly/vOu9a10 minutes ago by @dinet
- Bend It, Charge It, Dunk It: Graphene, the Material of Tomorrow? - NYTimes.com ow.ly/vOtLQ3 hours ago by @dinet
- Apple iPhone 6 images reportedly show production tools | BGR ow.ly/vPb2m4 hours ago by @dinet