This article is for subscribers only.
Please NoteExisting members: if you have not logged in since August 21, 2012 please reset your password before logging in as we have transitioned to a new system that requires a new password.
If you are already a Design Futures Council member or DesignIntelligence yearly subscriber, and don't have an account, please contact us and we will set it up for you.
A promising prototype for architectural education Read full »
Which schools are best preparing students for success in architecture? Read full »
An optimistic assessment on the future of the design professions Read full »
The following criteria were used to score world-class programs:
Results of the 2010 DesignIntelligence landscape architecture rankings by professional practices.
Historical results of the six years of DesignIntelligence landscape architecture rankings by professional practices.
Results of DesignIntelligence landscape architecture deans and chairs surveys from 2008, 2009, and 2010, which solicits opinions about respected programs as well as outstanding educators and education leaders.
Independent analysis and opinion by DesignIntelligence editors and Greenway Group analysts of overall campus environment for learning, technology resources, opportunities for integrated learning, skills assessment, and regional preference derived from surveys.
DesignIntelligence considers Landscape Architecture Accreditation Board accreditation to be a minimum standard for world-class status. LAAB analysis provides for a single standard for both undergraduate and graduate programs, so a standard score was used for each program.
DI.net RSS Feeds
DI.net on Twitter
- A First Look at the Shortlisted Bristol Arena Proposals | ArchDaily ow.ly/IeLkx1 day ago by @dinet
- Architecture That's Part Space Opera, Part Science - CityLab ow.ly/IekfY2 days ago by @dinet
- Architecture vs. PR: The Media Motivations of the Guggenheim Helsinki | ArchDaily ow.ly/Iehwt2 days ago by @dinet