This article is for subscribers only.
Please NoteExisting members: if you have not logged in since August 21, 2012 please reset your password before logging in as we have transitioned to a new system that requires a new password.
If you are already a Design Futures Council member or DesignIntelligence yearly subscriber, and don't have an account, please contact us and we will set it up for you.
An optimistic assessment on the future of the design professions Read full »
Which schools are best preparing students for success as a landscape architect? Read full »
An interview with Yale graduate student, Michael Miller. Read full »
The following criteria were used to score world-class programs:
Category 1: Results of the 2009 DesignIntelligence rankings by professional practices.
Category 2: Results of the 10 years of DesignIntelligence rankings by professional practices, with more weight given to more recent years.
Category 3: Results ofDesignIntelligence deans surveys from 2007, 2008, and 2009, which solicits opinions about respected programs as well as outstanding educators and education leaders.
Category 4: Greenway Group independent analysis and opinion of overall campus environment for learning, technology resources, opportunities for integrated learning, and joint degree programs. Also incorporates student evaluations.
Category 5: DesignIntelligence considers National Architectural Accrediting Board accreditation to be a minimum standard for world-class status. NAAB analysis provides for a single standard for both undergraduate and graduate programs, so a standard score was used for each program.
DI.net RSS Feeds
DI.net on Twitter
- 32 “Discarded” Guggenheim Proposals You Should Know About | ArchDaily ow.ly/GaFE214 hours ago by @dinet
- ArchDaily’s 22 Most Popular Pinterest Pins | ArchDaily ow.ly/G8y8E17 hours ago by @dinet
- Mastering the Art of Secret Negotiations - NYTimes.com ow.ly/G8wdZ20 hours ago by @dinet